By Brandon Smith
I was recently watching a new interview with 92-year-old Noam Chomsky, a figure of general worship among leftist academics, and I began reminiscing about the first time I read the book ‘Manufacturing Consent’. Though I have never agreed with Chomsky’s politics I have always appreciated his analysis on the methods the establishment uses to control mass psychology and silence popular discourse. I have long felt that this was an area where the political left and conservatives might intersect in our views and find common ground. This is why I felt an extra dose of disappointment when I witnessed Chomsky go off the deep end this week and suggest that people who refuse to comply with vaccine mandates need to be ostracized from society.
Chomsky compared people who don’t comply with the vaccines to people who don’t comply with traffic lights, suggesting we pose an imminent danger to others and that we should be removed. When asked how unvaxxed people forced out of the economy could be fed (how would they survive), he asserted “that is their problem.” Chomsky does not explicitly say that force should be used to eliminate the unvaxxed from social participation, he merely insinuates that “actions” might be required to get the desired effect.
I was around 20 years of age back in 2001 when I first read Manufacturing Consent. I was young and not fully aware at the time of a basic function of the political left and socialism that is vital to understand: Many people claim there is a “spectrum” of political beliefs on the left and that there are those that support socialism or centralization while also supporting freedom, but this is simply not so. At the core of their ideology freedom has no home, and when pressed on where they truly stand every socialist WILL eventually support tyranny as a means to achieve their Utopian vision of society.
Chomsky has long claimed himself to be a “libertarian socialist.” In the past I have found that a classic misdirection of covertly authoritarian people is to tack the “libertarian” label onto whatever they believe in. Con-men like Chomsky figure that most normies don’t actually know what libertarianism is, but they’ll assume it means that you “support liberty.” It’s a calculated abuse of the ideology designed to mask the collectivist’s true intentions.
I don’t even know that I personally fit into the libertarian framework, but I do hold some of its basic tenets as fundamental.
A key pillar of libertarianism is the Non-Aggression Principle – A foundational rule for society that says the use of force or coercion to impose one’s beliefs or ideology on others is wrong, and the use of force in general is wrong unless it is in defense of yourself or the lives of others. The problem with socialists and collectivists is that they ALWAYS find a way to claim that their brand of force is somehow in defense of the lives of others. That is to say, the “greater good” is the go-to excuse for all modern totalitarians.
Chomsky will claim that his hard-line stance against unvaccinated people is predicated on saving lives, and that’s the great swindle. When science and logic is applied, we see that the vax mandates have nothing to do with protecting the lives or safety of the public. That said, those same mandates are very effective in elevating the socialist goal of total centralization. How convenient…
Chomsky’s bias is evident in the lack of rational thought he puts forward. In fact, Chomsky never addresses the basic contradictions inherent in his claim that traffic laws and vaccine mandates are the same.
Firstly, covid mandates are NOT laws; they are dictates that have never been voted on by a single legislature nor the American people. This means mandates are meaningless in a legal sense. At least with new traffic laws the voters or legislators get some say in potential changes. The vaccine mandates are purely totalitarian in nature and completely circumvent all constitutional checks and balances.
Imagine if one day Biden assumed defacto control over all traffic rules, and then claimed the authority to deny all people who run red lights access to the majority of jobs and the overall economy? That would be absurd, right? Well, that’s exactly what Biden and his globalist handlers are doing with the covid mandates.
Secondly, obeying a traffic light is not the same as allowing yourself to be injected with a barely tested experimental mRNA cocktail – a “vaccine” which numerous health and virology professionals have warned could have potentially damaging side effects including autoimmune disorders, blood clots and infertility. Traffic lights have been in existence for decades; we know a red light is not going to harm our health. The covid vaccines have been in existence for about a year and have no long term testing (that has ever been released to the public) to back their safety.
All vaccines in common usage today were tested for at least 10 to 15 years before being released for use on the wider population. The covid vaccines were slapped together at “warp speed”, at least according the official story. Who are the guinea pigs for these mRNA jabs? The entire human population. Every person in the country is now considered a guinea pig.
We have no idea what the implications of this unprecedented experiment will be in the next few years.
Chomsky’s comparisons are obviously ridiculous and it’s frustrating that I’m required to point this out. One would think that the co-author of ‘Manufacturing Consent’ would be able to easily discern the massive differences in terms of violating public freedom. But, for some reason he can’t seem to grasp the foolishness at the heart of his debate. Or, he is being deliberately ignorant because he thinks, like many globalists, that there is something to be gained in going along with the farce…
The “greater good” theory is meant to either appeal-to or silence conservatives and libertarians that oppose the vaccines on the grounds of the non-aggression principle. Covid mandates rely on the claim that the unvaccinated are an integral danger to society as a whole, and thus force is justified. Now, I have been asking this question over and over again for the past year to any vax fanatic I run across, and not a single person has come up with a valid counter-argument:
If the vaccines work, then how are unvaccinated people a threat to vaccinated people? If the vaccines don’t work, then why take them in the first place and why mandate them?
What does Chomsky think the average death rate of covid actually is? Is he aware that according to dozens of peer reviewed studies the median Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of covid is only 0.27%? Who exactly are the unvaxxed a threat to? Less than 1% of the population? And if we are actually a threat to these people, then maybe THEY should take the vaccines, if they think the vaccines truly work.
What about the fact that vaccinated people still transmit the disease to others, according the the CDC narrative?
Furthermore, new studies from countries with very high rates of vaccination have shown that natural immunity formed by people who have already had covid (like I have) is superior in protection against future contraction or transmission of the covid virus. Natural immunity is up to 27 times more effective than the vaccines. It trumps the jab to an epic degree.
And what about all those breakthrough cases and deaths of fully vaccinated people? Chomsky must be ignoring those as well. Nearly 60% of all people hospitalized in Israel are fully vaccinated; 56% of all covid deaths from April to October in Ireland were people who received at least one vaccination. Who caused that? Unvaxxed people most of whom have superior natural immunity? Or, vaccinated people with low comparative immunity and the ability to transmit the disease?
Maybe Chomsky just isn’t educated on the science, or maybe he doesn’t care. Either way, his mentality is destructive and typical of socialists and leftists.
I am reminded of a radio show I did many years ago out of the UK which presented itself as a kind of liberty forum. As it turned out, the host was a socialist with some tourism into libertarianism and he was anxious for a debate. I was a little annoyed with the ambush on the merits of socialism but my position on it is simple enough that anyone should be able to understand it:
If a group of people want to form a community or collective based on socialist values then they should be allowed to do so in peace, as long as all participation is voluntary and they don’t try to harm anyone in the process.
At first the show host appeared to agree with this idea, but his support of personal freedom proved superficial as the debate went on. His argument was “What about all the people in society that need our help, such as those that are in poverty or are disabled? Don’t we need a centralized system in place to manage these kinds of problems?”
My response: “By all means, go and help those people if you want to help them. Just don’t try to force me to do it. I might want to help them too, but I will do it in my way, not yours.”
And here is where every single socialist shows their true authoritarian colors – The host then argued that while I might be a good and charitable person the majority of people, in his mind, are not. And so, we must all be forced by government to contribute to society in the manner “society” has deemed appropriate.
There you have it. Like Chomsky, this socialist was appealing to the greater good as a tool to impose HIS ideological vision onto everyone else; not to protect the lives and freedoms of individuals, which is the ONLY purview of government, but to make people participate in the way HE thinks they should participate. People must be forced to uphold social standards, and the social standards are coincidentally defined by the very people that benefit most from collectivism.
At no point do socialists and leftists ever suggest that more individual freedom might be the best option for elevating the greater good. Their solutions always involve progressively less freedom for the individual and more power for the government, the same government which they expect to control.
To be clear, I’m not talking about silly notions of anarchy, just constitutional protections for inherent freedoms. The political left only seeks to erode the liberties codified in the Bill of Rights, and no matter where they are on the leftist spectrum they all end up at the same terrible draconian place given the right circumstances.
This is evident as the vax mandates spread around the world, with nations and states run by leftists now mired in oppression. The facts are undeniable – Blue states are enslaved, red states are free. Leftists support tyranny, conservatives support freedom. Millions of people are trying to escape blue states; almost no one wants to relocate to one.
Even Noam Chomsky, a supposed anti-establishment champion, reverts to little more than a decrepit dictator rationalizing mass starvation when the opportunity to enforce vaccine mandates arises. Maybe he is feeling his mortality along with his age and fear of covid has overwhelmed his senses. I doubt it. I suspect the promise of collective power is so intoxicating to all socialists that their masks and costumes fall away and their true character emerges whether they want it to or not.
There is not a single shred of scientific evidence to support the forced vaccination argument. There is not a single shred of proof to support the claim that an unvaxxed person is a threat to the safety of anyone else. I’ll say it again – Mandates are not laws, and even if they were they would be unconstitutional laws. There is nothing legal, rational, scientific or moral compelling me to submit to an experimental vaccine. Chomsky and his ilk have no leg to stand on.
So, we are at an impasse. They want power over us, and we will not give it to them. Therefore, the law of the jungle takes over. The bottom line is this:
I will not comply with your illegitimate mandates. IT-WILL-NEVER-HAPPEN. And if you think you can use leverage to force me to comply, threatening me with poverty and death through economic discrimination, then I will view your actions for what they are – An attack on my freedoms and my life. I will therefore respond in kind and eliminate the threat by any means necessary, and, I will be justified in doing so, constitutionally, rationally, scientifically and morally.
Covid cultists like Chomsky, most of them leftists and socialists, should keep this in mind as they continue down this path. They think that the greater good is on their side but this is a fantasy driven by their own hunger for dominance. The question you need to ask yourselves is this: Do you really think your desire to force the mandates and your political ideology on me is greater than my will to stop you and remain free? Are you ready to risk death to impose the vax mandates? Because I am ready to risk death to end them.
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
With global tensions spiking, thousands of Americans are moving their IRA or 401(k) into an IRA backed by physical gold. Now, thanks to a little-known IRS Tax Law, you can too. Learn how with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals how physical precious metals can protect your savings, and how to open a Gold IRA. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
Let’s go Brandon
What he said, ” Let’s go…… you know, the thing……….oh yeah….Bran uh don.”
And might I add, Let’s go Mr. Smith.
Another great essay…
Best first comment ever!
Thank you.
What this article points to is how unsustainable the elite/socialist plan is. We will know soon if people can wake up in sufficient numbers…not just in politics/election in VA , but to every crisis we are experiencing currently.Every system, supply chain,food,money,political,etc,is not sustainable. The old systems won’t work anymore. They are corrupt and divisive,made that way by the DS/ elites. The good old days are gone,the chaotic,grim,living thru the collapse days are here..how many purebloods does it take to care for each dying person who is/was uninformed,under informed or just plain mentally ill enough to take the shot. So the living will struggle to survive and care for the sick and dying.There will be payback for those involved in this species depop event…Evil this large with its scorched earth attempt will lose in the end but surviving and building the new will be very sobering.
This is very similar to the picture I am seeing as I run this simulation in my mind repeatedly. There really do seem to be adverse events happening and a big one is the degradation of the immune system. When confronted with the “vaxx dillemma” I have likened it to throwing a live-saver to the drowning victims rather than just jumping right in myself. What good will I be to anyone if I too am thrashing about in the cold waters of the exploratory medical treatment they are calling a vaccine. It’s not easy to tell a person ‘they got had’, but that conversation seems to be inevitable.
I caution myself in regard to feeling a sense of relief in regard to standard political events. I simply cannot shake the feeling that the game is rigged. I am not “gang-affilliated” but I find myself in the conservative camp without even thinking about it. In the end it is about values and content of charcter, which are two things that the bipolar duopoly tries to negate when they divide people into camps. Sure the Youngkin won, but he stepped down as CEO of the Carlyle group to do it. This is nothing more than a pressure release valve because the frogs in the kettle were getting agitated. That and to get people reinvested in the voting process…. If pushing for forced inuculation continues, we will know what the real deal is.
Let’s go Brandon! 👍
I have always found it interesting the old know it all gnome Chomsky, along with the other uber authority Peter Singer, have never included God in their complicated conclusions as to remedying their ills in their societies. Nope, not once.
I think for the most part they are false gatekeepers whos primary goal is to keep the narrative within certain parameters. The logic is that if a mass movement is growing, it needs to be intercepted, co-opted and controlled. I’m sure I dont need to list examples…
Yep.
https://www.alexanderazadgan.com/2017/04/21/has-noam-chomsky-been-a-controlled-opposition/
Precisely correct. Of course, the fact that its (((chomsky))) and (((singer))) might have something to do with it…
Although I am a Nichiren Buddhist and not a Christian, my main objection to the left and socialism in general is the complete removal of anything spiritual from their belief system. Their libtard politics has become their religion and they’re just as fanatic as any holly roller of any religion (they are in all faiths).
Great article, Brandon!
“Chomsky’s comparisons are obviously ridiculous and it’s frustrating that I’m required to point this out. One would think that the co-author of ‘Manufacturing Consent’ would be able to easily discern the massive differences in terms of violating public freedom. But, for some reason he can’t seem to grasp the foolishness at the heart of his debate. Or, he is being deliberately ignorant because he thinks, like many globalists, that there is something to be gained in going along with the farce…”
I think Chomsky is willfully ignorant.
Let’s put his quality academic work and some good books aside; Chomsky – the International Left’s icon – appears to me more and more as a controlled opposition. I won’t even be surprised that he is also a zionist agent.
Apparently he has “forgotten” the immense ravages of the communist and socialist regimes of the past century.
P.S: about CV19 Injections:
https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-injections-will-cause-massive-death-dr-elizabeth-eads/#more-25692
I’m a big fan of Nassim Taleb’s antifragility books, and somewhat respect the man despite his temper. He’s far from a socialist or a dumbass. However, COVID has made him into something else. He’s become a frightened angry man beset with cognitive dissonance.
This has been a hell of a psyop to which even people like him are susceptible.
Well it certinly does seem to be a serious trial for the psyches of those exposed to it. Dozens of people I consider educated and intelligent fell not only for the fear narrative but the retribution piece as well: “they should be shunned, locked up, etc..” The one thing that this social engineering project has done very well is divide ideologies to the point where people simply will not listen to anything outside their chosen narrative. For instance when I present eveidence I get: “I dont like your sources” despite dozens of footnotes…. Or when I forward an article there is flurry of activity and a few cheap pieces debunking whatever I had on offer. It’s really insidious, they have managed to marginalize descent to the point of outright censorship and denial. I mentioned myocarditis in young males to my mother and she scoffed at me.
Yep, group allegiance seems to take priority over logical thought and scientific method, especially in people with multiple degrees.
I’ve stopped talking about the VAXXXX to family members, especially to my adult offspring, who have been.
Despite giving them all the available info so they could make an “informed decision” and say no to this poison.
It’s appears to be pointless. They tune out. What’s done is done. I also DO NOT ever want to hear whether they get the next jab, or the next one after that, and the next one after that.
That’s too painful for me to hear. Time will tell the outcome.
I won’t say “I told you so.” They’ll remember. Will they blame it on something else?
Who knows.
Copied and pasted you comment to forward to my 2 children….one of which is having an adverse reaction now.
Horseman –
I’m really sorry to hear that. Praying he or she does get better and has learned a thing or 2 about criminals in high places.
Rough path ahead. Stay focused.
Always remember, this is not about Covid…it’s the “vaccine” stupid.
COVID was the opportunity to implement the globalist takeover of our freedoms and the vaccine is the vehicle by which they arrive to the “destination” of controlling our behaviors and everyday life thru vaccine passports. This is all about permanent power and control over the masses thru digital IDs and social scores. Total tyranny.
It is about control of the fake ]]]money[[[
Lets also remember that “Covid” was the manufactured opportunity, created in the first place to usher in this plan and was Phase One, of who knows how many other “next” phases they have planned for the World. As a Brit I look no further than the Georgia Guide Stones for that answer…..oh and lets not forget the Kabala, the seat and HQ of which, is located here in The City of London with the Zionist Bankers running this show hand in hand with our treasonus Peodophilic British Royal Family. Prince Philip is quoted as saying he wanted to be reincarnated as a virus to control world population. No doubt he is trying it out now as he is sitting at the Right Hand of Satan as we speak.
The injections, the passport, the CBDC and the ability to turn the means of survival on and off at a whim. This is the goal. There will be an attempt at Climate LockDowns, and it will all be for the greater good. There will be a signifigant portion of the population that will not go along with it, and will create their own systems. This is happening now. The real problem will be when the State in whatever form tries to step in and deny a means of survival to millions of citizens.
When your working for the dark side the job of being used NEVER ends until your dead. The 90 plus year old club of elite narcissitic psychopaths are still under the whip!
I’ve learned over time that anytime you hear an appeal to “the Greater Good” argument that you are classifiably in listening to someone in the same group as those who cannot fathom, “The lesser of two Evils…is still EVIL”.
Surely, we are near to the requisite “Parting of the ways.” if not, we will in due course be drowned in a Tsunami of “Greater Good”.
JOG
Yeah, just hearing about how we’ll all be taxed to death “for the greater good” because of our “selfish” carbon emissions makes me sick to my stomach.
Exactly. Taxed to death. Jabbed to death. 🤨😖
Gnome Chumsky has always been controlled opposition.
One clue is that the New York Times has consistently called him “The most important intellectual alive.”
He showed his true colors on 9/11 by always trying to shutdown debate on that issue, with the ridiculous assertion that “..it doesn’t matter who was actually behind the attacks.” Yeah, right. Barry Zwicker did a great takedown of Chumsky in this regard in his book “Towers of Deception.”
And earlier than that, Chumsky consistently ran cover for Israel by criticizing it one one hand but steadfastly denying that Israel had any significant influence over the US political establishment.
Right, that was it for me. I have never really read much of his work, but simply been aware of the halo that surrounds him. The 911 bit did it for me. Now I just file him under EverySingleTime….
Yeah, I also used to respect his opinion, but when it came to him siding with their Agenda, I was out and done with him.
Never read word one from Chimpsky, something seemed off
Its called using The Hegelian Dialectic
https://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm
Well ….OSHA published their “over 100 employees vaccination” requirement today. Now the damage gets serious. Really big companies may flip the bill for weekly testing to get around the requirement but smaller firms won’t be able to afford it.
…and the definition of fully vaccinated will be a constantly moving goal post.
A couple weeks back I read a paper published by a doctor (its a blur now) that said a healthy person will die somewhere between the 5th and 8th shot. This will be short-lived (like most of the deceived) but could be a couple very rough years.
….guess I’ll turn off my automatic mortgage payment…may need the cash (at least until it is hyperinflated to worthlessness….LOL)
Well I think it was in the Washington Post that it was quoted: “You will never be fully vaccinated”
There you have it, really not much else to say other than they already started moving the goal post in other nations…..
Yes. I believe that but, as I wrote, it will be short-lived. Case in point: this interview with Greg Hunter and Dr. Elizabeth Eads https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-injections-will-cause-massive-death-dr-elizabeth-eads/
Learned a lot. Thanks for the heads up. 👍
They always say “For the greater good.” The greater good for whom? The socialist pulled in the poor and needy and then had the audacity to say that nobody would help them voluntarily. Here’s what I tell people like that. I start with the pertinent question of “Who knows who is needy in your town or area better than the people who live there?” then hit with “and who knows who is playing the system and just plain lazy better than those same people?” Now for the finale. “Then why should a government who has no idea of who these people are or what they are about decide who gets ‘help?’ Shouldn’t it be left up to the people of the area who know who is actually needy and who is simply lazy?”
People are generally good about helping others. It’s only when they are forced to do so that they balk. Why should I spend my hard earned money on food to give to someone if they can simply go down and apply for SNAP? In that sense, I already ‘gave at the office.’ I give money to homeless or struggling but I give it to whom I choose on my own gut’s feeling about them. I won’t give to someone who I believe will only use it from drugs or booze. I MAY buy them a sack lunch from a fast food joint though along with a bag of food for their dog if they have one. That’s MY decision and my choice.
I know that was off topic of the vax… sorry.. but the same holds true for the vax. I agree with his questioning. I ask this since the ‘science’ now says it’s doesn’t prevent disease or the spread of disease: How is a vaxxed person safer to work around or be around than an unvaxxed person? If the ‘break through’ cases are due to a variant which the vax doesn’t cover, then why force me or anyone, to take the vax in it’s present form as it’s now obsolete? How would the IRS feel if you presented all of your tax records to them on floppy disk? (I just had to throw that last on in. LOL)
“The State is closest to the divine on Earth.” Philosopher Hegel
THAT is why all major decisions MUST be bureaucratic. Anti-bureaucracy is anti-God
BUREAUCRACY is in fact closest to the divine. . .we hold these truths to be self-evident
I mean they. . .
Chomsky has been off the deep end, languishing at the bottom of the pool, for his entire life.
Each day is one day closer to the first skirmish that will lead to the first battle. Try to deny the people who actually work to keep society going and eventually you will get violence. Seems weird that they want the violence so much, but maybe they know something we don’t. Either way, I’m mentally, physically, spiritually, and tactically prepared for the Franz Ferdinand moment that will kick everything off.
If you like Brandon’s articles, you might enjoy my podcast/blog.
https://linktr.ee/doublethoughtdimension1
well said Brandon
Movements like these and the atrocities that follow, always start with words. Words are then taken up as a call to action and a (false) rationale for doing so.
When Mr. Schwab said that until everyone is vaccinated, all of humanity was at risk (and echoed by the “Doctor” who doubles as a vocal cord cutter), it was clear they were on an all-out mission to force this on all of us, by whatever means necessary. Coercion will take them as far as it can get them, and when the wall has been hit, the remaining holdouts will be rounded up and killed.
All must be transhumanized and from the Muslim playbook, be either converted or killed.
We must never take words like these lightly, no matter how loony these pronouncements may seem, or who they may come from. They are an early signal of a declaration of war, and have a way of spreading and morphing into action, which I knew would follow.
Indeed words are not mere characters on a page. They are the semantic code that we transmit thoughts, ideas, intentions and reason. They emerged from the human psyche as magical symbols by which information could be stored and transmitted. Words can be used to move mountains and send waves of humans wandering across the landscape. With use of messaging and repetition these seemingly whacky concepts get transmuted into reality. Check out Bernays or Lee Ivy. These are some sinister people who were given access to the control of society and did the bidding of their evil masters. Their work is with us today. Look at Cass Sunstien and the like.
We also have words, and the web while it lasts. Thus the attempt to block freedom of association. The tried to destroy Gab, now Soros is coming out with some new propoganda brand, Good Information of some such unimaginative term. We can compile dossiers, track what they do and point out the fallacy in their shallow works. Sure it kinda sucks, and yeah I’d rather be workingon my next masterpiece but at some point it becomes more important to fight for freedom and liberty and we are way past that point now. Always remember humor, lampooning and a bit of mockery are effective when waging these kind of wars.
The following is very excellent presentation that is well worth viewing and sharing.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=09maaUaRT4M&feature=youtu.be
All socialism leads to tyranny,…… boy if I have to live to be 90 to know that maybe I do deserve him. Socialism IS TYRANNY!
Chomsky is a total gatekeeper, and his silence on 9/11 and his complicity with the official narrative/ conspiracy theory prove it. I also read Chomsky as a youngster and thought he was brilliant, but these past 2 years have proved to me that many of the most “radical”, “progressive” and “anti-establishment” among us end up advocating for tyranny at the drop of a hat. So many phony hypocrites! (or just their true colors as Brandon points out.) As for the contest of wills, well, that’s exactly what it is. I live in Philadelphia and can’t even go out to a majority of clubs/venues etc. because I haven’t gotten and WILL NEVER GET the so-called vaccine. The vaccine passport is here and expanding. The only reason I got into firearms seriously in the first place was because I perceived that forced-vaccination was and is the endgame, and I don’t plan to go gently into that good night.
Old Commies Never Die they just Go Batshit Crazy
“If the vaccines work, then how are unvaccinated people a threat to vaccinated people? If the vaccines don’t work, then why take them in the first place and why mandate them?”
It’s a great question, as it cuts straight to the core of the matter. I, too, have yet to receive a single, intelligent reply.
I skimmed OHSA’s 490 page PDF document on this “mandate” that was just released. They don’t go anywhere near that question. In fact, I didn’t see any mention of the purpose of the mandate being to protect the vaccinated, which proves they know full well the conundrum that would bring forth. Of course they do. The whole thing is framed in the notion of saving the unvaccinated from themselves, which makes every paragraph of this piece relevant and right on point. This article completely eviscerates their 490 pages of pure drivel. Well done, Brandon!
OSHA, I mean. Sorry. I’m in Ohio. Every time I type an “O” it’s reflexive to follow it with a “H.”
OH!!
Beautifully eloquent Article!!! very well written. Yes… LETS GO BRANDON!!!
“What does Chomsky think the average death rate of covid actually is?” That’s the question I’d like to ask all the vaccine sheep. I suspect, judging from their hysteria, that the answer would be 99.9999999%. How did we get into this madness? And how do we get out!
Great article.
I know it’s an over simplification but you basically have two choices:
Fight or flight.
Either you leave, exit, secede, decouple from, or not participate in “their system”
Or you eliminate them.
We are way beyond looking at 2022/2024 “elections”
The two idealogies CANNOT coexist
One will always seek to destroy the other.
1775 – “I know not what course others may take but as for me, give me liberty or give me death” – Patrick Henry
1836 – “Remember the Alamo!” – General Sam Houston
1944 – “NUTS!” – General Anthony McAulliffe (His response when German Commander demanded surrender at Bastogne during WWII Battle of the Bulge)
2021 – “Let’s go Brandon!!!” – Freedom loving Americans
Does anyone know the short/long term effects of being tested for Covid once a week, or every other week? Rather than take the jabs, get tested instead of losing your job. I can’t find anything on this. Thank you for any response! Jack
Dont count on the test,the cdc is going to remove it,in like 2 months…
I would not even count on any of the test swabs to be safe. My guess they have put toxins even in the test swabs. That’s not a scientific opinion…..just that I do not put anything past their dirty work.
The tests mean nothing and are also rigged. False positives, false negatives???? Remember even into the nose it goes directly into the mucus membranes. Also, just seems to play (prey) on peoples fears and, in my estimation, another money grab!
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/which-covid-test-is-accurate
I took a stand, was fired, and I do not regret it.
Thank you for another important article, Brandon.
Academics suck and it is why this will be resolved with violence. Because as Gerald Celente likes to say: “When people lose everything and have nothing else to lose, THEY LOSE IT !”
I just learned that the CDC doesn’t have a 100% vaccination rate.
Thank you again for crystalizing the issues Brandon.
.
A slightly alternative perspective leading to the same conclusion:
.
The word “greater” in “the greater good” is already a problem. The word “greater” sneaks in relativity. It leads to “the end justifies the means” arguments, instead of a solid principle that is just plain “good”. Hard example: do you support the torture of a suspected bomb-planter to reveal the device? Is it OK under “the greater good”? Yes. Is it OK under just plain “good”? No – the end does not justify the means, without personal protections it is not a society worth saving, it is in God’s hand to reveal the device, i.e. are we willing to die to stick to our values. It kinda always leads to being willing to die for priciples, which leads to faith – which is what we believe defines those principles and the big issues of life and death.
.
“Good” can only be what supports the will of God and He explained how to do good (achieve the “greater” good) in His commandments. As you explained, love can not be forced. Any “social care” by a government is by definition to steal from someone because he/she is presumed to be evil, devoid of love and that the government must make the love happen, implying people in government love and the rest are sociopaths incapable of love (i.e. evil). Rubbish. They are breaking the rules of “the greater” good by stealing AND forcing. As you explained, love is a personal choice and every person can choose if and how to do charity.
.
Anyone who declares what the “greater good” is at any point in time must also necessarily know the future in order to know that it is indeed good for eternity. There is only One who does.
Often the so-called “greater good” is nothing more than an excuse for fossils like Chomsky and their army of bottom-feeding leftist trilobites to satisfy their desire for dominance.
The most important paragraph in this article is this one:
“I will not comply with your illegitimate mandates. IT-WILL-NEVER-HAPPEN. And if you think you can use leverage to force me to comply, threatening me with poverty and death through economic discrimination, then I will view your actions for what they are – An attack on my freedoms and my life. I will therefore respond in kind and eliminate the threat by any means necessary, and, I will be justified in doing so, constitutionally, rationally, scientifically and morally.”
I would love to see an entire article expounding on this. What is the best way to prepare to “respond in kind”?
Check out my newsletter – The Wild Bunch Dispatch, at THIS LINK.