This article was written by Vasko Kohlmayer and originally published at LewRockwell.com
“Pfizer and BioNTech’s Covid-19 vaccine is just 39% effective in Israel where the delta variant is the dominant strain according to a new report from the country’s Health Ministry” we read in a CNBC report. Astonishment is one’s first reaction when coming across this piece of information, since it was not so long ago the vaccine manufacturers claimed their products were 92 to 98 percent effective.
The manufacturers’ initial claims, however, have been steadily revised down as real-world data has been coming in. In March of this year news came from South Africa that “AstraZeneca vaccine doesn’t prevent B1351 Covid.” A couple of months later, the Hill ran a piece by a Baylor School of Medicine virologist who observed:
“A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine provides only 51 percent protection against B.1.351 of South Africa.”
Just a couple of weeks ago, we learned that recipients of the Sinovac Biotech’s vaccine have no antibodies after six months. This effectually means that merely half a year after being injected into people’s bodies the vaccine has zero percent efficacy in protecting against Covid-19.
Even factoring for the variants, the hard data makes it quite clear that the initial claims of vaccine effectiveness were greatly exaggerated. This, of course, comes as no surprise to anyone familiar with the dynamic of the pharma industry. Drug manufacturers tend to wildly overstate the efficacy of their products, while doing their very best to understate their side effects. It is for this purpose they conduct trials that are manipulated to obtain the results they wish for. Sadly, they too often get away with it because of the corruption of the system by what is called regulatory capture. This is why the outcomes of manufacturers’ trials are almost never replicated by independent trials or real-world data.
This is what has apparently happened with the Covid vaccines. The manufacturers used the sense of emergency brought on by the pandemic to conduct rushed and incomplete trials which were designed to yield the results they wanted to see. There is every reason to believe that the effectiveness of their injections was nowhere close to the 92-98% range they initially claimed even for the variants that were in circulation at that time.
Needless to say, one has a strong suspicion that even the meagre 39 percent figure is still overstated. This would only be natural, since everyone involved in the vaccination enterprise – the manufacturers, politicians, regulators, the medical establishment and corporate scientists – is trying their best to save face and reputation in the face of this fiasco. Bad though the data is, we can be quite sure that it has been massaged to soften the blow.
You can clearly observe this tendency at work in the CNBC piece which claims that even though Pfizer is only 39 percent effective, it still protects against serious disease. But this is simply not true, which you can easily see if you take the trouble to look into the data put out by the Israeli government. At roughly the same time that CNBC filed its report, the Israeli Ministry of Health published a bulletin which reported on Covid cases in the country. According to their data, there were 137 serious cases in Israel of which 95 were fully vaccinated and 42 unvaccinated or partially vaccinated (see here and here). In other words, the bulk of the serious cases was comprised of those who had received their shots. If the vaccine was as effective in protecting against heavy illness as the article claims, the numbers would look completely different. The figures published by the Israeli Ministry of Health shows that the claims of Pfizer’s efficacy of protecting against serious Covid are simply untrue.
This has been confirmed by the testimony of Dr Kobi Haviv, Director of Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem. In a recent TV interview, Dr Haviv stated that the fully vaccinated people account for about 90 percent of hospitalizations. Given that less than 90 percent of the Israeli population is fully vaccinated, it would appear that the vaccination not only does not prevent you from contracting the disease, but actually increases one’s chances of becoming a serious Covid case. Observes Dr Haviv: “yes, unfortunately, the vaccine… as they say, its effectiveness is waning.” And so it is, indeed. Dr Haviv’s interview is on YouTube so you can hear the truth straight from his mouth. It will be interesting to see how long it will take for the Establishment Censors to take it down.
I think people are being mislead into thinking that the native virus is the cause of COVID. There is a virus which for some reason the CDC, Fauci, WHO, GAVI etc don’t want identified. In my opinion (a retired physician), the fact that seemingly healthy people with no risk factors succumb to COVID is due to the lethality of spike protein and nothing more! They want you to think that the spike protein only promotes attachment of the virus to the ACE2 enzyme when in fact, the spike protein IS the weapon. When you think of this as MO, things make more sense.
The native virus itself is totally benign. That’s why they don’t want it identified. It serves only as a vehicle, a Trojan Horse, to deliver the spike protein weapon. If people realized the virus itself is benign, and it was the spike protein all along which is causing the disease, they would revolt. It is the equivalent of poisoning the water and food supply.
These “vaccines” were NEVER designed to address immunity, resistance to, or ameliorate infection. They were designed to carry a disease causing spike protein, and in a chain reaction, get the body to manufacture more of them, and possibly even spread them once released back into the person’s blood stream and respiratory tract. Of course the numbers would increase- as long as they could inject more people.
Therefore, you would expect to see a “resurgence” in COVID. The elite want to blame it on mutations which indeed can naturally occur in all viruses, but that is all a ploy. Forget whether the new virus strains like Delta or Lambda are causing a resurgence in COVID. These “variants” are essentially no different than the original. The increase in cases is due to the fact that more people have now been injected with spike proteins and mRNA and in turn are producing more spike proteins, causing more disease. That is the plan. Think only that this charade of “variants” is designed to trick more people into getting injected with even spike proteins (and any other harmful substances like graphene that are hitching a ride ). After all the number of COVID cases are increasing-if they can fudge the data like that out of FLorida. Had it not been for the brainwashing of the people into sumitting to these injections, the “epidemic” would have subsided. In other words, for this epidemic to sustain itself, there needs to be a baseline number of injections to sustain the production of spike proteins. If there are not enough injections being given, than NATURAL herd immunity will overcome the “success” of these spike protein injections.
I think part of the problem the elites are having is that the virus is not lethal enough to scare people into submitting to these injections, and that cheap effective countermeasures like Ivermectin and HDCQ have not been suppressed to the extent they needed to be for the elites to carry out their plan.
Indeed, ironically, the success of this COVID hoax may depend on achieving herd stupidity, not herd immunity.
Great comment.
This is an extremely useful comment that is helping me understand things about the chemical cocktail that I didn’t before. Thank you, doctor.
Bravo! “Herd stupidity” I believe was reached a long time ago, in the US at least.
I was asked about the claim that Covid hasn’t been isolated in another comment section here recently. Since then I’ve researched it a bit and I do believe that it’s certainly been isolated enough to sequence and utilize for PCR data (when not done too amplified). The original claim that it was never purified did not come from a source which I give a lot of credibility to..
Taking the approach that the simplest explanation is the most likely one, I would give the folks “in charge” the credit to create a pandemic based on a real virus, which was given “gain of function” mutations in a laboratory in order to give a sufficient basis for a pandemic. Basically a repeat of the Spanish Flu, which was a natural mutation, but caused death due to ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement) in people exposed to a similar but different version in the Russian Flu previously.
All corona viruses have spike proteins – that’s the “corona”. Covid has a more tightly binding version, due laboratory selection process and genetic engineering assistance, according to what I’ve read.
It may have been known that the spike protein could muck up the works when it was chosen for the vaccines. But it’s the mechanism for viral attachment, which is what an effective vaccine would block, by stimulating production of antibodies to it.
What I suspect was part of the plan, was knowledge that ADE is a definite problem with creating vaccines for this kind of virus. That is because macrophages (the garbage eaters of the immune system) are able to become infected when they snarf up virus. The reason they are attracted to eat the virus is because they have a receptor for the back end of antibodies – the Fc part. When there aren’t enough antibodies binding to the virus’ spike protein to neutralize it from infecting endothelial cells, but there are non neutralizing antibodies sticking to it, along come the macrophages, using their Fc receptor, gobbling up the whole virus and getting infected. When macrophages get infected, they release molecules to attract other lymphocytes and cause blood vessels to become leaky so lymphocytes can come rescue. These are called cytokines, and now we see the term cytokine storm.
So when a vaccine is given to an original covid, it creates a selection process for mutations that aren’t neutralized by the vaccine antibodies. Such mutants then are the perfect situation for ADE. Are we getting ADE now? Some people think the Israeli data might indicate that. When you get vaccinated people hospitalized, it could be because of their vaccine status.
If you use Google Trend, you’ll see searches for ADE are twice as high recently.
Like I said, I’d prefer the simplest explanation, rather than hyperbole about things which aren’t backed by science. If a large number of people get ADE from Delta or maybe Lambda or the next variant (which could also be lab generated if needed), it will have the desired effect. No need to evoke the killer spike protein theory, although I tend to believe there might be microscopic blood clots gong on, as per Dr. Hoffe’s limited study.
Just my 2c’s worth..
In all that is going on I have thought that many factors simultaneously contribute to the over all state of our current situation.
The very real gov’t created homeless crisis is still exploding at the same time covid cases are exploding along with new variants even AFTER many got the shot. Fires burn in rural areas (in CA specifically outside of the Megaregion counties) are involuntarily relocating large segments of the population into urban dwellings or what I call communist housing or even said homeless camps? To be clear, and in my opinion/observation, the government created the homeless crisis by simply opening up the US real estate to foreign buying power of which the local demographic can’t compete with. We are priced out plain and simple. While some locals have done better than others; the US was more or less functional with the poor living and adapting in remote areas where land was cheaper and services were not so convenient.
There are articles coming out comparing smallpox and other known diseases of times past and of course citing that vaccinations are the key along with passports or cards. But after reading some very old documents detailing the smallpox problem in the UK it is clear there was a battle of anti-vax vs. the vax establishment. The anti-vax claims that sanitation, or lack there of, is the contributing factor for the disease. The vax crowd says while a tramp can get the bug on his person or clothes he then makes his way to a dwelling where others can come in contact with him and get the disease. Sanitation has nothing to do with that. But this seems like cherry picking data to me. Had the tramp not been exposed to the filth in the first place he would be less likely to come in contact with the bug and literally carry it on to another part of town.
Homeless camps are not known for sanitation. A tried and true method of spreading disease. Homeless camps also serve as a political tool to enrage the public until we demand the gov’t do something. Many camps are in public view and in or near redevelopment zones. Antifa riots are also centered around redevelopment zones. Several massive projects coming together at the same time? Not a coincidence!
You stated in another article the exact words that I used and have publicly commented over a year ago. My quote is “it has to be your idea.” Because taking away our God given right to live a peaceful life will not be done by force.
Sorry if this is a bit clunky to read but I had some thoughts to put down then ran out of time. I just hope you get my point. Perhaps next time I write and edit separately then post.
The 39% claim is in itself fraudulent or at best deliberately structured to mislead
The efficacy claim is based on Pfizer’s claim of “relative risk reduction”. They say it has “95% efficacy” because it sounds impressive, but overall the vaccine is said to reduce your risk of suffering covid symptoms by only around 0.4%. But even this claim is dubious as the testing program has a much higher rate of false positives. And of course there are the negative side-effects of the vaccines on top of this.
Any ‘expert” saying the vaccines are proven, that they are effective and that they are safe is lying.
Your article references a 92-98% effectiveness. The pharmaceuticals gave numbers in the mid 90s, e.g. 94+ and 95+. What was not disclosed is that these ~95% numbers are Relative Risk Reduction values and were subsequently fed to the public who took them to mean if I get vaxxed then I can walk through a Covid ward with impunity. What the public should have been told was the Absolute Risk Reduction which is ~ 1% for all 3 domestic clotshots. See Ronald B. Brown: Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/3/199. Using an ARR ~ 1% gives vaxxed vs unvaxxed risk something like:
vaxxed risk: 49-61%
unvaxxed risk: 50-62%