By Brandon Smith
After the publishing of George Orwell’s 1984, communist governments and organizations around the world condemned the book as “anti-Soviet slander” and “capitalist propaganda.” Orwell died only eight months after the book’s release and his personal feelings on the details of the story are limited to a few personal letters to friends and publishers.
Orwell was a Democratic Socialist, but even he was disturbed by the path that socialist movements had taken in light of genocidal far-left governments. His criticisms of Stalinist politics were treated by leftists as a betrayal.
However, it was Orwell’s depiction of women within authoritarian systems that angered the political left most of all. They have attacked 1984 for decades as “misogynistic”and “blind to gender oppression”. But as time passes, Orwell’s views on leftist women have proven more and more prophetic and they were written well before second wave feminism became a reality. In 1984, the character of Winston Smith described them thus:
“He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy…”
“She had not a thought in her head that was not a slogan, and there was no imbecility, absolutely none, that she was not capable of swallowing if the Party handed it out to her…”
The women in Orwell’s Stalinist world were a key tool in controlling society. They are easily brainwashed to serve “Big Brother”, turning them into affection-less robots. Their ability to nurture a family is conditioned out of them and if they are allowed to have children, they have no care for them. The children immediately become property of the state.
It’s not just women’s biological habit of following the dictates of the herd, it’s also their inherent desire for chaos that makes them destructive to society at large. Nearly every civilization from the beginning of recorded history has understood this problem and sought to keep it contained. Only in the modern west in the past century have we abandoned reason for madness.
I have said it many times in previous articles and I will repeat it here now: Feminism is by far the most destructive movement in the history of western civilization. In the US, almost every political and social crisis we face today can be linked directly or indirectly back to the rise of feminist ideology. The weaponization of mentally ill women is the single most effective attack on the foundations of our culture.
It’s not because women are particularly scary or dangerous. It’s because, as western men we have adopted principles of fairness; to care about elevating those who are weaker than us and value their contributions. Feminism is designed to exploit our love of fairness and our love of women and it turns our love into a weakness.
Compare the west to almost any other civilization in this regard and you will find undeniable differences. There is no such thing as fairness, equal rights or feminism throughout most of the world. Women are, at best, barely tolerated. At worst, they are chattel to be abused with impunity.
Often considered one of the greatest accomplishments of the First World (as opposed to the third world), men have ALLOWED women to rise to equal standing. In many cases, we have prioritized them and given them privileged status, and this is where we made a big mistake.
All of our problems with feminism are self created. Western men allowed the ideology to spread. Conservatives talk a lot about the dangers of “suicidal empathy” when it comes to liberals and mass immigration, but we suffer from suicidal empathy when it comes to women.
The early women’s suffrage movement had numerous ties to Marxist causes and the communists saw very early how useful women could be in destabilizing western nations. Marxists like Friedrich Engels argued that women’s oppression began with the institution of private property and class division, not biology.
This, of course, is pure nonsense – A great lie which requires us to ignore thousands of years of recorded history from every feudal monarchy and empire that existed previous to the 18th Century Enlightenment.
Because of their biology, women are naturally removed from the power dynamic except for influencing men to take actions in their favor. For women as a group to have power requires numerous artificial social constructs and laws be put in place.
Marxists also argued that the family unit must be targeted for deconstruction as a social pillar. They claim that the family unit is “how capitalism uses women as free labor to raise new workers for the system.” In reality, the family unit represents the atomic core of any civilization. Breaking it apart, and using women to do it, will inevitably destroy that civilization and make it ripe for conquest.
Leftists and their globalist cohorts do not care about women. Feminism does not care about women. The goal of these movements is to turn women into suicide bombers. Their goal is to radicalize women to forsake their biological and psychological imperatives, turning them into corrosive saboteurs willing to sacrifice their own happiness for the sake of the Marxist cult.
Millions of women have even been convinced that their grand mission requires them to kill their own children. Sometimes this is done in the name of freeing themselves from the “shackles” of the family unit. Sometimes it’s done as an offering to the collective feminist coven to prove they are “worthy.”
This is why a child killer like Lindsay Clancy, a woman who openly confessed to the crime, has attracted the full attention, adoration and protection of the liberal congregation. She didn’t just go to a clinic and abort a baby, she went the Full Monty; she murdered her own growing children in cold blood. She looked into their eyes when she did it, and the feminists are impressed and they want more.
What has followed is a sort of hysterical worship, a swirling vortex of dark-feminine chaos as the brood searches for ways to protect Lindsay Clancy from punishment while also rationalizing her crimes. The case has become a nexus point for the ever festering conflict between the champions of moral order and the terrorism of morally relative chaos.
In my recent articles I have talked about the eternal battle between the producer class and the pillager class, but this is only half the story. The other half is the battle between the champions of conscience and the purveyors of subjective nihilism. The political left has happily embraced nihilism.
We might find it bewildering, but this is why these people are defending a child murderer. If Lindsay Clancy can be glorified, even deified as an oracle of the feminist calling, then any evil can be justified. “Do as thou wilt” could become the prevailing ideal of a soulless age brought into being by female insanity.
All they have to do, in their view, is help Clancy to escape blame and responsibility for her crime.
The postpartum excuse is the most common strategy because it works. Around half of all female child murderers who use this defense get off with a jury decision of “not guilty by reason of insanity.” The concept ignores the fact that ANYONE who kills kids is mentally ill or broken in some way. Postpartum is simply a more acceptable excuse for diminishing the crime.
It’s a way to paint the killer as a victim; a more empathetic victim than the dead children.
If western women can be convinced that they can get away with murdering their offspring out of the womb, we would be setting a new and horrific precedent. The feminist mob will jump on every crime involving a woman in an effort to leverage them out of repercussions. The legal system already has so many double standards in favor of women, but we are getting dangerously close to a two tier system.
If Clancy escapes with a lesser charge or institutionalization instead of prison, leftist women will see this as political victory. That said, the case is opening the door to an awakening among men. Young men are using the case to “test” their girlfriends and wives. If these women show any inkling of sympathy for Lindsay Clancy, men are dumping and divorcing them without a second thought.
It’s a smart move and, for now, it’s the only strategy against the ongoing cancer of liberal female derangement. But it doesn’t solve the greater issue of feminism as a societal influence. In the meantime, families are not being built.
I would point out that there are men who kill their own children as well. It’s not as if this crime is exclusive to women. However, I can’t find a single instance in which a mob of men rallied together to defend a father who murdered his family. This is strictly female behavior.
The Clancy trial is nearly over, and regardless of what the jury decides to do there’s no denying that the event has reminded us, once again, that western men have ignored the single most poisonous problem in our society for far too long.
Liberal women are the most privileged, most entitled and most coddled people on the planet. No other group comes close. Their obsessive grasping for power by any means necessary is like a plague. Their rabid efforts to elevate their own egos as the focal point of politics, government and the social contract is sinking our nations one by one.
Perhaps this quest for power needs to end? Perhaps western men need to finally abandon the liberal experiment in equality or “equity” and bring our countries back to the models they were founded on? Or at the very least, we need to bring back certain limitations. Not all freedoms are good and we have seen where our current path leads.
If liberal women have been weaponized, then liberal women need to be nullified and controlled. Or, at the very least, their level of participation in institutions of power needs to be restricted. In other words, we would have to set aside our empathy, be the bad guys and TAKE power (and rights) away from the leftist cabal. We would have to fundamentally overturn every facet of feminism and erase it from our daily lives.
We have seen what these women do with liberty and we’re not impressed. The celebration and adoration of a child murderer is, in my view, the last straw. If their first inclination is to use their freedoms as a license to tear the world down instead of building things up, then they no longer deserve those freedoms.
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
The dollar buys less today than it did a year ago, a decade ago, a generation ago. That slide is the predictable result of endless printing and borrowing. Dr. Ron Paul believes the FED has the answer. But they’re keeping it to themselves. Fortunately, a new financial chart has publicly exposed their secret moves. See it for yourself HERE.
You can contact Brandon Smith at:
You can also follow me at –
TwitterX: @AltMarket1
41 Comments
I feel like this incident is yet another prong of the same pitchfork to incite civil war in our western society as part of that whole divide and conquer strategy. This time instead of pitting race&religion against one another its now genders against each other. More couples separating because of conflicting viewpoints equals less American family units being created, thereby further pushing the cultural replacement agenda. We already have a dating, marriage and birthing crisis in this country. If this lady walks or gets a slap on the wrist (which I believe she will), this will open the floodgates for other deranged white women to kill their own kids with no fear of serious repercussions.
You gotta hand it to the outside forces attempting to take us down, they sure as shit have been doing their homework and are very clever. Let’s hope more ppl can find out who has been orchestrating all this mayhem before its really too late.
I think the problem is that a lot of people mistake these divisions as being “engineered” when the reality is, these divisions have always existed naturally. What the elites do is tap into preexisting conflicts, they don’t create them from thin air. In other words, if you give women too much authority or social influence, it naturally drives them insane and causes immense conflict with men. The globalists simply give society a push in that direction. So, it’s not enough to “fight the globalists”, we also still have to get control of crazy women.
While I think you are correct that this feminist conflict occurs to some degree on its own, and especially when communists push the agenda, I have to believe that there is also an agenda to the timing of all this too. Why is YouTube just now allowing men to speak out against feminism? I have to wonder if we are about to enter a new phase of the globalist system where women will be forced into subordination, compliance and somewhat more traditional role models in order to support the next phase of the global agenda. The snap back effect is definitely going to be brutal as women are put back in a subordinate role as nature intended, but it might come in a way that creates yet another large problem, or support yet another harmful and destructive agenda. At some point in time, society will have to either wake up and realize that our women have become a bunch of out of control, disrespectful, psychopathic child killers, or else the whole society will perish. Women are extremely gullible and it would not take much public effort to fix the problem, but the will to make traditional family and marriage work again has been missing for many years because homosexuality has been the driving force behind feminism and women’s rights. One anti feminist woman argued that 80% or more of American men are now gay. And when men arrive from south of the border, their first response is often that America is sickeningly gay.
The movement against feminism is entirely the fault of feminists. I grow a bit tired of this black pill mentality, thinking that every positive movement for change is somehow secretly controlled by the globalists. They’re not omnipotent and they fail regularly in their agendas.
Indeed, much of it is just plain old stupidity on the part of the American people. So many gave me a hard time and shamed me for not getting married when I clearly saw feminism for what it was and now I’m watching them divorce and have their own wife and kids stab them in the back. And they’re crying now as their families are being destroyed by all the modern movements that they mocked me for trying to warn them about decades ago.
Hi Brandon,
Thanks for this thoughtful essay. Having recently researched the rise of narcissistic personality disorder in the age of social media, I have started to wonder whether narcissism lies at the core of feminism and other left-wing ideologies. Narcissists lack empathy, are deeply concerned with controlling others and have a grandiose sense of self-importance, while also lacking accountability. If no such study has been conducted, I believe now is the right time.
When talking about mentally ill women I would clarify that aren’t we talking about Most women in general? Highly irrational beings & to think they give these people guns & badges to boot. Does the WNBA represent All of this idiocy?
Call it mental illness, feminism, demon possession, spoiled rotten females, hysteria or whatever you like, but at the rate we are going, spoiled rotten females and destroyed families are going to become so disturbing to society that it will have no choice but to deal forcibly with the situation. Law enforcement officers are already becoming aggressive about using tasers on these out of control, hysterical women when they slap an officer.
Outstanding work, Brandon. Spot on. These women must be contained. Reason must be elevated. Get the women out of every position of government, of authority or of power. I’m shaking my head as I write this, remembering so many instances where I thought to myself “Oh dear God no, not another female _________(Fill in the blank). Ladies, go home, make babies, raise good children and respect your husbands leadership.
I’m all for equality. I’m for passing a law that says women are entitled to the same percentage of jobs in top management as they hold among brick layers, cement masons, plumbers, iron workers, asphalt rakers, roofers…..well, you get the idea. But really, all we need to fix this is sound money. Before Bretton Woods, and then Nixon closing the gold window, a working man could support his family without the wife needing to work, and families were strong and kids had respect and good manners; or else! Now it looks like the narcissistic psychos above our pay grade would rather burn it all down than act rationally. But at this point, that might be better than the Orwellian hellscape we seem to be getting immersed in.
Eh, the problems started in the 1920s, not in the 1970s. Sound money won’t solve the feminism issue. The Founding Fathers had it right from the beginning – We should remove voting for most women and government participation for most women, specifically women without families. Also any person regardless of gender with diagnosed psychological issues and anyone on psychotropic drugs should be kept out.
While women did get the right to vote in 1920, I’m pretty sure it didn’t all just happen that year. It takes time for perversion at that level to mature into a political agenda, a movement and then make it through the legislative process.
I simply don’t believe that a nation of majority heterosexuals will allow women to have the right to vote. It’s just way too antithetical to family values where the man is the head of the household. So while sleeping with immoral politicians can go a long ways towards passing legislation in this case, I have to believe that homosexual had a strong grip on America as far back as the turn of the century in 1900.
Well, I agree, it didn’t all happen overnight. But, I would say that if you look into the history of propaganda in America from 1910 to 1920 (and the work of Edward Bernays), you’ll see that there was a big push to radicalize women at that time. Don’t know if the people behind that were all gay, but it wouldn’t shock me if they were.
I’ll have to look up Edward Bernays. Thanks.
“The women… a key tool in controlling society. They are easily brainwashed… their ability to nurture a family is conditioned out of them… children immediately become property of the state… women’s biological habit of following the dictates of the herd… weaponization of mentally ill women is the single most effective attack on the foundations of our culture.”
.
This is exactly the kind of thing one would expect to see on a World gone insane. Where common sense, decency, values and ethics are gone and erased. Where Life itself has been devalued to almost nothing. When people no longer think or have an active functioning conscience. Where The Very Worst Among us hold the positions of power. Where a normal decent human being no longer has a chance against those odds.
.
“Because of their biology, women are naturally removed from the power dynamic except for influencing men to take actions in their favor.”
.
And men allow women to rule THEM because men cannot control their sexual urges and needs. Period. Men will do anything… sacrifice anything… demean and surrender themselves and their dignity just to satisfy an overwhelming desire for quick sexual release. But is it sexual release when you ‘need’ to do that all over again very soon after the ‘last’ release? As a man you are not in control of yourself whatsoever. You are being fully controlled by a woman (in most choices)… and most certainly by your very own out-of-control and ruling Male Member which thinks of nothing else other than its next place of fulfillment. But again… it’s not really fulfillment when you just have to keep doing it and doing it without end. That is addiction and compulsion.
.
This is not to demean what Our Creator gave us a natural desire. This IS to condemn how that nature need has been turned into as a weapon to destroy a man… to destroy men… and ultimately, do destroy our species and society and the Planet.
.
All that… for a few damn seconds of pleasure. At what a cost. It’s not so much pleasurable when you honestly see how much that has cost you… and your Manhood and dignity. (And how can a ‘normal’ woman ever respect a man who so easily surrenders his dignity just to satisfy an animal urge).
.
“We have seen what these women do with liberty and we’re not impressed.”
.
Many Women do not want liberty. Some still quietly seek to be dominated because they have suffered abuse and are broken. Most women do seem to want to be a man’s boss. Nobody is interested in true equality. Men AND Woman both speak much about equality as long as each one remains the dominant ‘Equal’ member of the pairing – at least in their own eyes.
.
People have long spoken about the War of the Sexes. But Our Creator did not create The Sexes to be at war but to be partners in the manifestation and preservation of Life. Somehow our World has gotten completely away from that.
.
Many men today would be better off by themselves only than to be with a predatory off-kilter woman (and vice versa). This is not how God planned it.
.
Humans have decided to turn The Sexes from a divine partnership into World War. And the result is to create an insane World at War because neither sex remembers what God intended them to be…
.
Men surrender their power to women to allow for gaining ‘entry’ for an animal-drive release. Feminism is just one part of a larger problem dynamic.
Partner you say? Well Howdy there pardner!!! Must of had a long hard day on the trail. Can I water yer horse for ye?
My point? We gotta stop letting the devils servants define the terms and nature of the relationship between a man and a woman if we ever want to see women as feminine again. Right now men do not meet women as if they were male and female.
“I will not meet thee as a man” is a famous phrase from Isaiah 47:3 in the Bible.
Another woman goes crazy and gets shot by police today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdJLComd_Bg
Oh what to do with these psychotic women? Arrest, convict, and force sterilize. That or summary execution. Those are the choices. Anything less is social suicide. A democratic republic can only find its way with a moral compass. We die from a thousand cuts such as from these lab rats who wave placards in public that celebrate infanticide. Might take a king to keep the ship off this reef. Might take a keel hauling to drown these plague infested rats.
Anyone who has a mother, girlfriend, wife, or sister, SHOULD know that women are far more emotional than men. With emotions being crazy easy to manipulate, it’s really easy to manipulate women en masse.
I do think the great manipulators are behind radical leftism, including “feminist whackos” to quote RL. That said, once the momentum is started, it’s self perpetuating without other positive outside influence.
Throw in drugs of all types, legal or otherwise, and a public miseducation system that teaches men that they are a problem and you have pyscho leftist women that emasculated men don’t know what to do about.
Anyone who is a parent should see how leftism, in general, is a massive immature emotional manipulative movement. A bunch of adult bodies that never learned, or had the opportunity, to grow up. Riots are adult temper tantrums.
America is in serious trouble, and the left seems hell bent on making it worse. It’s mass insanity that will lead to their destruction, either with the entire country, or when the sane people finally say enough is enough. Of course radical insane leftists in the legal system make things even more difficult.
Sooner or later there’s going to be a great reset.
The question is, what will emerge from it?
Soeoh, I think you’ve got the picture.
Another aspect that isn’t being discussed is accountability. See the movie “As Good As IT Gets” for the quote on how he writes such good female characters …”I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability””. If Clancy is held accountable then that means women at large will also be held accountable going forward. The fear of this inflection point in the zeitgeist is real.
Even Sigmund Freud threw his hands in the air when it comes to women. “The great question which has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer despite my 30 years of research into the feminine soul, is: ‘What does a woman want?'” I can’t answer that question, either. I learned to leave women alone a long time ago.
In a recent re read of Edward Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” it struck me just how many times Gibbon commented negatively on women in or near the reins of power. Many of those comments are quite similar to what Brandon has noted in this article. The founders were wise in so many ways and one of those was confining the vote to males.
Brandon, sorry to be late with this comment, but I just received it via e-mail from a friend. It’s satire, of course, but relevant to your excellent commentary. I don’t know the source, but suspect it’s from the Babylon Bee:
U.S. — New poll numbers released this week showed Lindsay Clancy surging into the frontrunner position in the race to become the 2028 Democratic presidential nominee.
Clancy garnered overwhelming support from Democratic women and continued to make gains among men who hate children and wish they were dead.
“Clancy 2028! Wooo!” shouted supporters outside the courthouse where Clancy was awaiting the verdict on her triple homicide case. “No one gets us better than Lindsay. Who better to fight for women’s rights than a woman who stared down the system that wanted to punish her for murdering three children? She is like, so me! We love you, Lindsay!”
Democratic operatives warned that the issue of child murder could complicate Clancy’s general election chances, but liberal voters have thus far brushed aside those concerns. “When I hear this sad story of a child being strangled to death, I think, ‘Wow, that poor woman strangling her child. She’s the victim here,'” explained longtime Democrat Stacy Marks. “Why on earth should someone not vote for Lindsay when she is the one who has been wronged here? That shouldn’t keep a beautiful soul like her from serving as our next president.”
At publishing time, Clancy’s support among liberals had collapsed after revelations surfaced that she had also strangled a puppy.
And yesterday, one of the biggest tools of the feminist movement, Gloria Steinem, died. Good riddance. The Marxist Movement has been in the radicalization movement business for a very long time. We have to our detriment, abandoned Biblical principles that our nation was founded on. We are reaping what we have sown. Many woman have abandoned their God given role in society and men have allowed it to happen. Good article Brandon!
If the thoughts you put forth in the first few paras truly represent your beliefs regarding us (women)how are you even able to function in our society? Is your mouth set in a permanent sneer toward each woman you meet who is not married, has no children by choice and who exudes peace and happiness? God help your dog if you are ever on a cross country trip and said dog gets mauled by a bear. If the only emergency vet center within drive distance is owned and operated by a female vet whose autobiography on her website suggests she is not married….alas. Your dog will die before you take him to that woman whose role in life is to nurture chaos. I truly do feel for your having lost the opportunity to befriend over half of the human population. Luckily, in my life, men such as yourself are a vast minority. Where I live we women pull on our jeans and boots before full daylight and get the day moving side by side with our friends and family- regardless of gender. Thank you for the reminder of how blessed is my life. ~Valerie~
It’s interesting that you take an article critical of a child killer and her cult-like followers so personally. It’s also interesting that, not once, did you condemn their behavior in the defense of your sex. It says a lot about you and women in general and only confirms my position. It’s also interesting that you assume men like me are a minority – No honey, we’re the majority and we see what you’re doing. You are delusional about the extent of your value to society beyond creating families. Society does not need you for anything else.
—————————————————-
It should be noted that my “chaos” observation is what most women seem to complain about with this article. It hits a nerve because it’s true. Many women, no matter how privileged a life they lead, absolutely refuse to be happy with what they have. They always feel they are entitled to more. Look at women like Lindsay Clancy: She was absolutely privileged, living in the top 1% of all women in the world, but still found a way to be miserable. As with many of these child killers, she didn’t want the responsibility of taking care of a family anymore, so she destroyed that family to escape her responsibility. Then she tried to take the easy way out and escape criminal responsibility by attempting suicide. This is why the majority of women need to be contained – They operate on chaos, entitlement and a mob mentality. Every civilization for thousands of years understood this; only in the past 70 years have we forgotten in the west, and look at the disaster it is causing.
Regarding your recent comment Brandon, woman are far more emotional and dramatic. This is not a good trait in leadership, and woman are not generally equipped for leadership positions in society. Like it or not, woman are much happier and suited for support roles. The biblical model is what is needed. Unfortunately, Marxist philosophy has upended biblical principles and many women have rejected the more traditional role a Mother, and home maker. Now woman consider themselves birthers and not Mothers! Thanks again for exposing this evil!
There is a precedent for the Clancy case: Constance Fisher, who drowned her three children in 1954, was released from a mental institution, had three more children, and drowned them also, in the same bathtub. From Wikipedia:
Constance Margaret Fisher was an American serial mass murderer. Diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, she killed three of her children in Maine in 1954. After spending several years in a mental institution, she was released, only to kill three more of her children in 1966. Deemed unfit to stand trial, she was hospitalized at the Augusta State Hospital, from which she managed to escape in 1973, but died in an accident shortly afterwards Continued in Wikipedia
And in the state of MA, Clancy has a chance to be released after only 6 months of treatment at a mental hospital. That’s the law there. Blue states are notorious for letting murderous women walk from these facilities. That’s why the feminists were so excited when they thought the jury was going to rule in her favor. Clancy still gets locked up, but the precedent would be set that she’s “not responsible for her actions”, AND…she could be freed almost immediately. Keep in mind, her defense was that she suffered a “temporary” psychosis – Meaning, if she’s faking it, then she can also fake being normal. Magically, she’s well again, and she gets away with murder. The postpartum defense is a fallacy. It can’t be proven or disproven, it’s based solely on the subjective claims of a female murderer.
I believe that a person that murders another (other than accidentally / unintentional / self-defense) should be separated from society permanently because they can never be trusted to not kill again. I do not believe that these people are being punished with a prison sentence or paying a debt to society. I do not believe that they can be redeemed. I don’t care where they are locked up — prison, mental institution or other — the key is that they can never be released into society again. If Clancy is released back into society she can never be trusted.
Why do societies make excuses for murderers?
Well…progressives make excuses for murderers. The reason? They are chaos agents and moral relativists. They WANT society to collapse.
Brandon, you may be wrong on Clancy. Lots of new evidence showing she was set up by her husband. Just sayin.
Zero evidence shows that. The husband would need teleportation powers to make that happen, he’s on camera at CVS at the time the kids were killed. Not to mention, Lindsay Clancy confessed. Don’t be retarded, Jeff.
Regardless of how you try to slice it and dice it, she is a murderer, can never again be a trusted member of society and needs to be permanently removed. This is a completely logical, non-emotional way for a society to respond to murderers.
Hi Brandon,
Can you please write more articles like this in the near future? Topics on manhood, etc.
This is one of your best articles ever. As men, I believe we have failed for at least 4 generations in the USA. However, because we are men, I believe we can succeed.
I will try – It’s a fundamental issue that needs to be addressed. I have a feeling that the feminist problem is going to be dealt with one way or the other in the near term. American men simply aren’t going to allow this insanity to continue when women are worshiping a child murderer en masse.
Women are marrying the government as a male partner replacement because they have been convinced males are toxic. They vote for all of the safety net they can get – the safety net that men used to provide.
I know many women that have tricked men into being sperm donors then discarded them and got them to pay for the resulting illegitimate kids. This is going on a lot more than everyone thinks in middle-class America. In many cases, this happens when the woman has decided that their relationship is not salvageable and have decided that all men are no good (they all say this when their relationships fail) but their biological clock is running out and they want a kid. Remember, birth control pills are 99% effective if taken correctly. In the end, the kids lose.
In one case, I know a mother that had children with two different men — the first two were from her marriage before she divorced. The second was from a man she was dating. She was receiving child support from two men for three children and she never had to work while the three of them were growing up. She also got her retired parents to raise them but she takes the credit because they turned out to be productive citizens. Now that her children are on their own, she has to work two jobs that she never had to work before. When it comes time to retire, she will happily let the government confiscate your savings so she can have it. Remember, she was fine confiscating her parents retirement to raise her kids. She see’s nothing wrong with the life she has led.
One of my neighbors is a single mother. She walks her 8th grade boy to school every day. The school is less than 1/2 mile from her home in a good neighborhood. Want to know why young men are so effeminate? They need a dad to keep mothers from sissifying their boys. But remember, men are toxic… so who is going to protect our country in the future, these sissy boys?
We all see this going on and know that it is wrong, yet we look the other way…
Abortion and gay marriage sealed the fate of this once mighty nation. Collectively, WE stood back and ALLOWED it to happen. Children, made in the image of God SLAUGHTERED in the womb. All of you are shocked now that Clancy can murder OUTside the womb? Where have you been. Secondly, gay marriage? One man, one woman committed for life. Marriage is the picture of Christ’s love for His church.
We deserve judgment.
I don’t think anyone here is shocked. In fact, we predicted this result. Fire and brimstone aside, it’s time to fix the problem, not simply wait around for judgement.